My big beef with current energy policy is that it appears to 
me that we spend gobs of money for oil and other fossil fuels - production, 
war, research, mining, etc.  but very little on research for renewable fuels 
that would truly provide energy independence for the United States.  We are 
largely dependent on overseas imports for our oil needs.  Combine that with 
our reliance on foreign entities to finance our trade gap, that is a weak 
economic position that only our guns and missiles can prop up.  From my 
perspective this is driven by lobbying from established energy companies 
trying to preserve the status quo.  They don't want to spend the money to do 
R&D for renewable fuels, cleaner processes, etc.  It is a lot easier to  just
keep drilling & refining.
We don't need a host of  prohibitions and regulations to mandate this change,
we can use a  combination of emissions caps & market based incentives to
further our  national interest.  I figure if my tax dollars are going to go
somewhere, it  should be for things like tax breaks for alternative fuel
research;  subsidies for developing cleaner burning plants; incentives for
consumers to  buy alternative products; figuring out if there are better ways
to deal with  nuclear waste aside from digging a hole in Nevada and hoping it
doesn't  leak.  All that stuff CREATES jobs....
Alas, the current energy policy  seems to be one of plunking a few drills
into Alaska and easing mining  regulations for coal & natural gas - while
relying on "cap & trade"  to govern emissions (the last one is particularly
disingenuous to me,  because, even if it does work to some degree in the
aggregate, the cost is  regionalized areas become particularly polluted).
Since the planet seems to  be maxing out on production capacity, and we've
got no new reserves here in  the U.S., I'm skeptical that we're embarking on
wise policy for our nation  in the long run.
1 comment:
Absolutely on target! I just heard some folks debating the merits of the union of environmentalists and conservatives who want to fight terrorism and our dependence on foreign oil. The downside is that lobbyists and politicians will probably only get government benefits to the corporations that have political clout, it won't be based on merit, or engineering and economic intelligence. We have to get the money out of Washington!!!
Post a Comment